Important Information

Congressionally Directed Spending (CDS). Earmarks. Are these the same thing? Different programs? And why is this suddenly part of the funding conversation?

The short answer: CDS and earmarks are the same tool, different names. Both refer to funding Congress allocates to specific projects at the request of individual legislators for needs in their own communities.

The longer story explains why this might feel unfamiliar. Congress banned earmarks in 2011 and did not revive them until 2021. A decade is long enough for terminology to fade, for expertise to retire, and for an entire generation of professionals to enter the industry without ever encountering the practice. When CDS returned, it came back quietly—with new transparency rules, spending caps, and disclosure requirements—but without the institutional knowledge that once surrounded it.

Today, CDS directs billions of dollars annually to specific projects, with significant allocations flowing through HUD, Transportation, and Defense. Since returning in 2021, the program has grown quickly—from roughly $9 billion and 5,000 projects in FY2022 to nearly $17 billion and 9,000 projects in FY2023. But this is not a predictable or guaranteed funding stream. Annual amounts fluctuate based on budget negotiations and spending caps. And a critical distinction: appearing on a CDS award list is not the same as receiving funds. Projects can be announced, even published, without money ever being delivered.

What Makes CDS Different from Most Federal Funding?

The opportunity is real. So is the complexity. Most programs require competitive applications— you write the proposal, wait months for review, and hope your project scores high enough. CDS works differently. This is funding your congressional delegation secures directly for specific projects in their district or state, outside the normal competitive process.

Michigan communities are already using it. But the process has rules, timelines, and realities that can trip up first-timers.

How It Works

CDS requests go through individual congressional offices—your two U.S. Senators and your U.S. House Representative. Each office sets its own submission process, priorities, and deadlines. There is no universal template; what works for one office may not apply to another.

Typically, offices open their request windows in late winter or early spring, with deadlines often falling in March. The member’s staff reviews submissions, vets projects for eligibility and alignment with the member’s priorities and selects which requests to champion through the appropriations process.

If your project is selected and survives the appropriations process, funding is included in the relevant spending bill—usually signed into law the following fiscal year. But selection is not a guarantee. Projects can be awarded funding on paper and never see a dollar delivered. The appropriations process has multiple points where things can stall, shift, or fall out entirely.

The Timeline Reality: CDS is not fast money.

The FY2024 appropriations bills were signed in March 2024. Projects funded through those bills are just now seeing money flow. That means a request submitted in March 2023 resulted in funding available in spring 2024—a minimum 12-18 month lag, and that assumes the appropriations process runs smoothly (which it often does not).

If you are hoping to fund a project that breaks ground next summer, CDS is not your path. But if you are planning two, three, or five years out, earmark funding can be a powerful piece of your capital strategy.

What Makes a Good Candidate?

Congressional offices receive far more requests than can be funded. Projects that rise to the top typically share these characteristics:

  • Clear public benefit: Infrastructure, public safety, environmental protection, community facilities. Private benefit projects rarely make the cut.
  • Shovel-ready or nearly so: Projects with engineering complete, permits in hand, and local match committed demonstrate readiness.
  • Local investment: Requests that show significant local match not just the minimum required signal community commitment.
  • Reasonable scope: Requests in the $500K-$3M range are more likely to succeed than $20M requests.
  • Alignment with member priorities—and values: Each congressional office has focus areas, but the label does not tell the whole story. A member on an environmental subcommittee could prioritize conservation. Another could prioritize energy production. Both fall under “environment”—but a project emphasizing one approach may not resonate with a member who champions the other. Do the homework. Review the member’s public statements, past CDS requests they have supported, and legislation they have sponsored. Then look at the other members of the subcommittee or caucus. If your project runs counter to the prevailing values of the group, it faces an uphill battle regardless of how well it fits the topic category.

Example: A treatment plant upgrade could be framed as a local infrastructure need. But if the committee includes members with stakes in Great Lakes water quality, the smarter play is to frame it as regional stewardship—one community doing its part to protect a shared resource that spans multiple states. Same project. Different narrative. Different outcome.

Nonsupplanting: What Is It?

Federal funds must supplement, not replace, existing funding. If local dollars have been budgeted for a project, federal money cannot be swapped out and local funds redirected elsewhere. CDS funding needs to enable something that would not otherwise happen—an expanded scope, an accelerated timeline, or a project that was unfunded entirely.

Michigan’s Funding Landscape

Michigan’s transportation funding picture just got more complicated. The Citizens Research Council recently noted that 70 percent of the state’s new road revenue streams face uncertainty—marijuana tax revenue is being challenged in court, and corporate income tax threshold changes remain unsettled.

In this environment, communities need every funding tool available. CDS will not solve the infrastructure backlog on its own, but a well-timed earmark for a signature project can move something off the wish list and into construction.

Communities that win are those that have their projects documented, their engineering advanced, and their requests ready when the submission window opens.

Thinking Beyond the Obvious Category

CDS funding flows through multiple federal agencies—Transportation, HUD, Defense, and others. A single project can often be framed to fit more than one. The category you choose affects which funding stream you tap, and which congressional subcommittee reviews it.

Example: A road upgrade in a small community might struggle to compete as a standalone transportation project. But that same road, reframed as access infrastructure for a senior housing development, could find traction under HUD—where the narrative shifts from “road maintenance” to “community development serving vulnerable populations.”

Before defaulting to the obvious fit, ask: Is there another door that might open more easily?

Getting Started

  1. Identify candidate projects: What is on your capital plan that has clear public benefit and could use a federal boost?
  2. Advance your engineering: Preliminary design, cost estimates, and environmental review make your request credible.
  3. Build your case: Document community need, economic impact, and alignment with regional or state priorities.
  4. Watch the calendar: Congressional offices announce their CDS request windows—typically late winter. Miss the deadline, wait another year.
  5. Cultivate relationships: The communities that get funded are often the ones that have built ongoing relationships with their congressional delegation, not just showing up when they need money.

Bottom Line

This is not a funding source reserved for those with inside knowledge or decades of experience—because that expertise largely does not exist anymore. Everyone is learning. Everyone is rebuilding. The difference will come down to who prepares, who builds the relationships, and who shows up ready. Readiness wins.

Every community has projects waiting for the right funding opportunity. If you want to explore how CDS funding could work for yours, reach out to your Prein&Newhof project manager or contact Jason Washler at 616-364-8491. We can help you identify which programs align with your goals and navigate the application process. The best funding strategies start long before any shovels break ground.

 

In recent years, Michigan communities experienced a wave of major infrastructure funding opportunities from temporary programs like the American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) and the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (IIJA).

As these funding opportunities end, budgets will tighten, application timelines will get shorter, and competition will increase.

As the funding playing field shifts, so should our perspective. Instead of grant hunting, or reacting to the newest opportunities, we should position ourselves to be ready and to hit the ground running as soon as funding is available.

What Does Grant Positioning Look Like?

  • Being shovel-ready for future opportunities
  • Packaging projects to meet multiple eligibility categories
  • Securing matching funds through creative, layered approaches
  • Building public support and telling the story of projects needing funding
  • Navigating changing deadlines and program shifts with confidence

Prein&Newhof can help! We’ve prepared some tools to help with this:

  1. Funding Radar Check-in: We flag programs that match your project goals and let you know what’s coming.
  2. Shovel-Ready Checklist: A guide and checklist to make sure your project is as ready as it can be for funding.
  3. Story-Telling Tools: Filling out forms is the bare minimum. Identifying the story behind your project and telling that story in impactful ways will accelerate your project funding efforts.

 

Want a readiness review? Talk with your Prein&Newhof project manager today! Give us a call at 616-364-8491 to get started.

 

 

By Stephanie Potoka

As early as middle school, I knew that math came easily for me. Around that time, my dad showed me an issue of National Geographic pertaining to a rising environmental issue that a relative was studying. This was also in the days of only three TV channels out in the country (four, if we rotated the antennae). So when I was home sick from school, watching the kid-appropriate daytime channel, I discovered a career plan. The show I found, hosted by Jaime Escalante of calculus teaching fame, was about using math in environmental applications. Given my math abilities and growing environmental knowledge, this added up to a concrete and comfortable plan. Was civil engineering on my radar at this point? Not even close. Numbers were too beautiful with their patterns and connections, as evidenced by another lovely TV show of that era, Square One, making the Fibonacci series, tessellations, and code-making both memorable and comprehendible.

As a result, I decided to pursue an undergrad degree in mathematics at Calvin University where some of my classmates were, of course, engineers. I was, however, not pulled into the field yet. My next life choice was grad school for a master’s in industrial and applied mathematics at the University of Minnesota, an introduction to the field of math modeling. Finding this not to be practical enough, I decided to pursue another master’s, this time in civil engineering. Nine years after undergrad, I was the proud holder of two master’s degrees and mom to three. Given the pressures of life, the added constraint of an autoimmune disease, and addition of two more kids, the solution was to spend the next 12 years at home watching construction work in our Chicago and then Grand Rapids neighborhoods with two machine-loving youngsters, while also making time for classroom involvement relating to environmental issues.

Thanks to a civil engineering friend, I started part time at Prein&Newhof as an engineer on the first day that my youngest started full-time school. At the time, I really had no idea what civil engineers did day-to-day, but I happened to land in what P&N considers a “support service,” specifically that of hydraulics and hydrology. To me this is essentially the civil engineering version of industrial and applied modelling all about water, including both water on the landscape and contained within a system of pipes (think drinking water as well as wastewater). There was still a firehose of information, a steep learning curve, and so many questions which my co-workers graciously answered (and continue to answer).

A useful way for me to dive into work was involvement in Water System Reliability Studies. Unbeknownst to the vast population of Michigan residents, communities do this overview examination of their drinking water system every five years. This data-heavy report includes a map of the entire system of watermain, details of storage tanks, pumps, wells, and treatment plants, as well as water-usage related data like total pumping and billing. The other component of the study is flowing hydrants throughout the system, recording the changing pressures and flows, and then bringing the field data back to the office to calibrate the hydraulic model of the system.

To use any computer model, we must trust the reality of its abstraction: that the model does not 100% predict the system, but it gets close enough to be useful. Initial computer models began as text only, simply a list of pipes and associated connections with the program performing all the equation computations of water flow that, for decades, people had done by hand (or slide rule!). Given its ease of use now, with graphics and all, it’s tempting to use the model as a black box with magical answers. Given the iterations of these models that senior professionals have seen, though, we always ask the question “Do the results make sense?” Because sometimes they don’t, and if not, we must find out why. The purpose of the model is to aid in identifying areas of the water distribution system that could use improvement, often with larger diameter pipe or increased pumping capacity. The whole reliability study involves not just the model, spreadsheets, and numbers, but also the fluidity of patterns and connections.

In addition to enjoying the technical components of my job, coming to the profession so late in life has elevated my appreciation of municipal Department of Public Works employees and managers, as well as surveyors, GIS specialists, construction contractors, and all others involved in the work of infrastructure. I always knew that the fundamental building blocks of our first-world luxuries (clean drinking water, treated sanitary sewer systems, roads, bridges, and rainwater management) were taken for granted but had no idea how extensive the work behind them truly is. These building blocks are not perfect, though, as anyone with knowledge of PASER ratings, groundwater contamination, storm water quality, and aging infrastructure would know. There are still uncountably many environmental issues to approach from different angles, but I derive great satisfaction in being part of the integral behind-the-scenes work to maintain and improve infrastructure for local communities. While I now am fully converted to engineer, I am thankful to still be immersed in the beauty of numbers.

By John VerPlank, PE

When people come to us with a vision, whether it be a new building, park, or parking lot, they often have a clear idea of what they want to create. What they may not realize is that before any ground can be broken, a lot of invisible groundwork has to happen first. Site design starts long before the first shovel hits the dirt. It begins with understanding the history, limitations, and potential of the land itself.

That early process, often called due diligence or feasibility, is where we help clients turn ideas into informed plans. Whether we’re working with a private business, an architect, or a local township, we start by asking the same questions: Is this site suitable for what you want to build? What challenges might we run into? How can we plan around them before they become costly surprises?

Laying the Groundwork

We understand that many owners want to minimize financial risk early in the project’s process until they’re confident their site is viable. To make the most of that early phase and build an initial understanding of site conditions, we often begin the feasibility study using readily available online resources like wetland, environmental, and soils mapping tools. From there, we request a MISS DIG/One Call design ticket to obtain utility maps and confirm what exists in the project area.

The Michigan Department of Environment, Great Lakes, and Energy (EGLE) Remediation Information Data Exchange (RIDE) website may provide insight into the property’s history, whether it once hosted a gas station, industrial facility, or landfill that could leave contamination behind. This kind of research, paired with United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) Soil Survey maps, may help provide initial insight into the existing site conditions. The U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) and ArcGIS mapping are also useful tools to understand the soil type, slopes, and drainage characteristics of the site. These details can help to determine where a building can go, how stormwater will be managed, and how utilities can be routed efficiently.

At the same time, we also verify important regulatory factors. We check zoning and setbacks to confirm that the project fits within local ordinances. We confirm whether public utilities are available and have enough capacity to serve the new development. A complete topographic survey, Phase I Environmental Site Assessment, wetland evaluation, and geotechnical investigation can also be completed during the initial feasibility study. However, these more detailed studies are often reserved until the preliminary results of the feasibility study give us confidence that the site is likely to work for its intended use.

From Information to Imagination

Once we understand the existing conditions, we can start conceptual planning. This is where the fun begins for clients: they get to see their ideas take shape. We develop conceptual layouts that show how a building, parking, access drives, and green space might fit on the property. We also prepare engineer’s probable costs of construction, helping clients understand the investment required. This phase helps us set realistic schedules and coordinate with local agencies for approvals and entitlements.

The process that follows can look a little different depending on the type of client and project. Private developments often move through schematic design, then design development, and finally construction documents, with each step adding more detail and refinement. For municipal clients, the path may be shorter or adjusted depending on funding sources, but the goal is always the same: to design responsibly and efficiently from the start.

One of the most valuable roles of a civil site engineer is assembling the right team to answer every question along the way. No single person has all the expertise required for a complex site. On many projects, we collaborate closely with architects, surveyors, geotechnical engineers, environmental scientists, and construction managers. Everyone brings a different perspective, and together we help clients make well-informed decisions.

A good example of why this early coordination matters happened on a recent project where we discovered groundwater only three feet below the surface during initial investigation. The client had already envisioned a new facility on that site, but the shallow water table created major complications for construction. If not addressed early, it would have caused costly delays and design changes later. Because we were involved from the start, we helped the client bring in the right specialists (environmental consultants, geotechnical engineers, and dewatering experts) to manage the issue effectively. We adjusted the design and construction plan so the project could move forward safely and successfully. That experience reinforced why due diligence isn’t just a box to check but is a safeguard for your vision.

Turning Complexity into Clarity

For many first-time developers or organizations expanding for the first time, this process can seem intimidating. My goal as a site design engineer is to make that process approachable. We take the technical details and translate them into clear options and next steps. Whether we’re preparing a feasibility report or final construction drawings, the heart of our work is partnership. Every successful project I’ve worked on has started with good information and open communication. When we understand the site, respect its limitations, and plan for the unexpected, we set the stage for a smoother construction phase and a better end result. At Prein&Newhof, we believe that engineering isn’t just about solving problems; it’s about anticipating them before they happen. The due diligence process may not be the most visible part of a project, but it’s what makes everything else possible.

If you’re considering a new development or wondering whether your property can support your vision, the best place to start is with a conversation. Every project can benefit from a little time spent understanding the site now to save a lot of time and cost later.

by Scott Post, PE

When I graduated from Calvin with a degree in civil engineering more than 30 years ago, I knew I wanted to design projects that helped people move safely and comfortably through their communities. Over the decades, that calling has taken me from sidewalks in small towns to multi-county trail networks that stretch for miles across Michigan. I’ve always had a passion for non-motorized transportation and outdoor recreation, and I consider it a privilege to plan and design the construction of trails that connect people to nature and to one another.

Boardman Lake Loop Trail

 

Early in my career, I had the chance to meet Fred Meijer, who was well known for his philanthropy and his commitment to building bicycle paths across West Michigan. When he learned that I design trails, he baitingly asked, “Why do we need an engineer to design bike paths?” I gave him the standard answers about drainage, easements, retaining walls, and construction oversight. He smiled knowingly, because he already understood. But his question stuck with me. Why should a community invest in professional design and oversight for something that looks so simple on the surface?

Years ago, a township asked the same question. They decided to save money by having a developer build a trail without independent design or engineering oversight. At first, the project seemed like a success. But it didn’t take long before cracks spread across the surface, weeds and roots pushed through the pavement, and poor drainage left sections washed out. Corners were too sharp, slopes were uneven, gravel wasn’t compacted properly, and the asphalt was laid in a single layer instead of two. By the time I was called back (first to design an extension, and then to evaluate the original section) the township admitted their cost-saving approach had backfired. The fixes would cost far more than they had saved.

By contrast, the extension we designed and observed was built to last. Two layers of asphalt, carefully compacted gravel, thoughtful drainage systems, and attention to details like curve radii and accessible slopes resulted in a smoother, stronger trail. Today, it only needs routine maintenance, and the township has confidence it will serve their community for decades. This experience wasn’t unique. After three decades and several hundred miles of trails, I’ve seen time and again that investing in good engineering at the start saves communities significant time and money and prevents future frustration.

Spoonville Trail

 

What has changed over the years is the role trails play in our communities. When I first started designing them, they were often viewed primarily as recreational amenities. Today, they are recognized as essential infrastructure. Trails connect neighborhoods, provide safe routes for students walking or biking to school, support local businesses by attracting visitors, and contribute to public health by encouraging active lifestyles. They are also increasingly designed with universal accessibility in mind, making sure that people of all ages and abilities can use them comfortably. Sustainability has become another focus, with green infrastructure to manage stormwater, materials that balance cost and durability, and layouts that respect natural landscapes.

I’ve also witnessed the growing importance of funding partnerships. Projects often succeed because communities pursue grants from MDOT, MDNR, and other agencies, and because engineers can help guide that funding process. A well-designed trail not only makes the best use of funding but also strengthens a community’s case for future support. Each project becomes a building block in a larger network of connected paths across Michigan, a system that links people not only to destinations but to each other.

Now, when someone asks me Fred Meijer’s question, I have more than the “engineer’s answer.” I have decades of stories of lessons learned, trails built to endure, and communities that continue to benefit from investing in doing it right the first time. Good engineering may not always be the cheapest option at the outset, but it’s the choice that pays back in well-being for everyone who steps, rides, or rolls along the path.

 

by Claire Vellinga, Construction Observation Intern

There are days where I take a step, and for a moment I simply take in the world around me and the space I fill within it. This is when I realize I am no longer a little girl with hopes and dreams. I am a woman with plans that align with my life goals. To be completely honest, I didn’t grow up wanting to be a civil engineer. I didn’t even know it was a career. But I’ve always had a knack for puzzles, logic, and problem-solving games and activities, so it seemed logical to look into engineering. Sitting in my freshman Introduction to Engineering class at Hope College, civil engineering caught my attention. I liked the fact that it seemed tangible. Things you could actually see and touch. However, even then I didn’t really understand how vast the field of opportunity in civil engineering was. It wasn’t until I started my internship at Prein&Newhof after my sophomore year that my curiosity and fascination within civil engineering really took flight.

One of my favorite parts of being on a job site is watching what I see on paper get excavated and constructed. I see it as a whole world underneath the world we know. The underground infrastructure fascinated me. While inspecting on site, I typically just see one small part at a time. But I’ve found it intriguing to look beyond just what is in the hole below me or on the plan set in front of me. Thinking about how everything is connected and carefully designed, calculated, and constructed to serve the needs of our communities is what I’ve found myself interested in.

This summer, I got to watch a live sewer connection. This was an interesting experience for me as it was the first time I had seen anything like it. Before that day, I don’t think I realized how complex and involved an infrastructure update like that can be. Between coordinating bypass pumping and the actual live connection, there was a lot going on. This experience really helped open my eyes to the bigger picture. While I was just looking at a pipe, a whole team of individuals was working both up and downstream to make sure the connection was smooth. That day, I learned a lot about coordination and constructability from a “hands on” perspective.

The “hands on” experience has been one of my favorite parts of interning at P&N. There’s a lot I can learn in the classroom, and from fellow engineers, but as a college intern, it has been extremely useful to actually see the work out in the field. It’s been fun to see things I read in a book, or got lectured on, show up in my field inspections. I’ve learned so much from observing and from asking questions. From basic terminology to phasing and environmental regulations, there is something new to learn every single day.

I’ve interned with the Holland Office’s engineering team for the past two summers, and Ken Bosma, Jonathan Nelson, Lucas Timmer, and Jesse Boogaard have been the best mentors. They answer my daily questions and elaborate further than what I even knew to ask about. From the beginning, they made it clear that no question was a stupid question. There is so much I have yet to learn, and they are more than patient in their explanation and reasoning. This environment made me feel safe to learn, grow, and make mistakes.

At its core, this is why I chose to join Prein&Newhof post-graduation. The work environment the team has created gives me the confidence and support I desire as a new engineer, and I know that I will take this experience and continue to keep learning as I grow in my engineering career here. I’m excited to know that this is a culture and community that I will continue to get to work in every day.

by Paul Reinhold, PLA, LEED AP, NGICP

As a landscape architect, my job is often seen as primarily visual—choosing plants, shaping outdoor spaces, coordinating materials. And while aesthetics do matter, what’s always been more important to me is how people experience a community gathering place. Who feels welcome there? Who can move through it with ease? How does the space represent the community who uses it? These questions have guided my work for decades and are at the heart of something I care about: universal design.

Universal design isn’t just about meeting accessibility requirements or adding a ramp to the corner of a park. It’s a design philosophy that seeks to create spaces that work for everyone. When we apply these principles to public spaces, especially in smaller communities, we open doors (sometimes quite literally) to a better quality of life for more people. When I was invited to work on the design of the Village of Muir’s Sensory Park, it was clear this project would be a meaningful example of universal design in action.

Why Universal Design Matters

Universal design is guided by seven core principles. These help us think beyond minimum requirements and imagine environments that support independence and inclusion for people of all ages and abilities:

  • Equitable Use: The design is useful and appealing to people with a range of abilities.
  • Flexibility in Use: It accommodates a variety of preferences and needs.
  • Simple and Intuitive Use: It’s easy to understand, regardless of a person’s experience or background.
  • Perceptible Information: Information is communicated effectively, even if someone’s vision, hearing, or cognition is limited.
  • Tolerance for Error: The design reduces risks and minimizes consequences of mistakes.
  • Low Physical Effort: It can be used comfortably, with minimal fatigue.
  • Size and Space for Approach and Use: It provides appropriate room for access, regardless of body size or mobility device.

I keep these principles in mind on every project, but they took on particular importance in the design of Muir’s new park.

Meeting a Community Where It’s At

The Village of Muir sits just under a square mile in Ionia County and has less than 600 residents. It’s the kind of place where people wave from their porches, where community parks serve as front yards and backyards all in one. Over the years, Prein&Newhof has worked closely with the Village, including helping to acquire funding and to design a new bridge over the Maple River in 2014. That experience laid a foundation of trust, and when the Village set its sights on creating an inclusive park alongside the Fred Meijer Clinton-Ionia-Shiawassee (CIS) Trail, they came back to our team.

The idea for the sensory park had been in the works since the Village’s 2017 Recreation Plan. Through public input and demographic data, it became clear that the community needed a space where everyone, especially those with disabilities, could feel at home. This wasn’t about adding a few inclusive pieces of equipment to an existing park. It was about creating a whole new environment grounded in accessibility, interaction, and sensory experience.

Designing with Intention

The site, directly next to Railroad Street Park and the CIS Trail, gave us a good starting point. But the original plan relied on land not owned by the Village. When the hoped-for easement didn’t come through, we had to adapt by reworking the design to fit within Village property while still holding true to the project’s goals.

It helped that this wasn’t just a park with a single purpose. We included a variety of play types and sensory features: a hillside slide, zipline, multiple textured play areas, a fireplace for gathering, a performance space with grass seating, and even a bike repair station. All of these were designed with accessibility in mind, from the surface materials to the layout of paths and seating. We also ensured that ramps, parking, and resting areas supported a wide range of users—not just children, but parents, grandparents, and anyone else passing through or spending time there.

As we moved forward, we helped the Village apply for the Michigan CDBG Public Gathering Spaces Initiative. This is a highly competitive grant program focused on improving usability, accessibility, and seasonality in spaces that serve low to moderate income populations. In 2024, the Village was awarded $1.2 million to bring the park to life. The funding was a major win, but the budget still required careful coordination. We worked with the low bidder and MEDC to value engineer where needed, always making sure the core vision of accessibility and universal design remained intact.

A Space That Belongs to Everyone

There’s something powerful about watching a design become a real place. In a community like Muir, where resources are limited but people show up for each other, it means even more. This park isn’t just for kids. It’s for the parent with limited mobility who wants to watch their child play up close. It’s for the grandparent who needs a smooth path and a place to rest in the shade. It’s for the child on the autism spectrum who feels more comfortable exploring quiet sensory areas. It’s for visitors on the CIS Trail who stop in to stretch their legs or fix a flat bike tire. It’s for everyone.

That’s what universal design looks like when it’s done well. It doesn’t feel like a set of accommodations tacked on—it feels like a space that simply works for whoever shows up. And in the end, that’s what landscape architecture is really about for me. Designing places that welcome people in, however they move, however they perceive the world, however they connect. I’m proud to have been part of making that vision real for Muir’s community.

 

by Will Thies, PE

It was the summer of 2016, and I was fresh out of college. Various learning opportunities inside the classroom and in developing countries had strengthened my interest in tackling water-related challenges, particularly water resources, distribution, and management. I had just been hired by Prein&Newhof to work as a General Municipal Engineer, and I was looking forward to applying some of what I had learned.

Shortly before beginning my work, I took a tour of the North Kent Sewer Authority’s PARCC Side Clean Water Plant with some other young engineers from Prein&Newhof. I had toured a couple of water and wastewater treatment plants before, but this was different. I was put face to face with tanks full of hundreds of thousands of membrane filters, pipes labeled “permeate” (something I had never heard of), buildings designed to look like big red barns, a room filled with nothing but large blowers, and much more. I was fascinated, and my eyes were opened to the world of process engineering. A few phone calls later, my plans at Prein&Newhof had changed. Instead of general municipal work, I became the newest member of the process engineering team and began learning about things like flanges, impellers, and plug valves.

What is process engineering?

Even after graduating with a general civil engineering degree, I hadn’t heard the term before. Process engineering is involved with the design of equipment and systems that apply energy to (and sometimes extract energy from) water or wastewater to transport or treat it. After all, water doesn’t flow uphill, and the waste we send down our drains has a habit of remaining waste unless we apply some energy to it.

Process equipment includes pumps, blowers, mechanically cleaned screens, grit removal systems, clarifiers, bioreactors, mixers, aerators, thickeners, digesters, and much more. This equipment is packaged together at facilities such as pump stations and treatment plants. These facilities are all around us, often tucked away by rivers and creeks—out of sight, out of mind. But this typically unseen infrastructure is critical to our communities.

Take pump stations, for example. The purpose of a pump station is to lift wastewater and push it through a force main to a high point where it can return to flowing by gravity. Without them, it would be nearly impossible to convey wastewater over large distances or from low areas to a wastewater treatment plant.

There are all sorts of pump stations in our communities. Some use pumps that you could lift by hand. Others use pumps that are as tall as a giraffe and weigh a few tons. Some pump from one corner of an intersection to another. Others pump up to 20 miles away. Some pump as much water as a garden hose. Others pump enough wastewater to fill an Olympic swimming pool in less than 20 minutes—that’s about 50 million gallons each day.

What does it mean to be a process engineer?

As process engineers, we get to be on the cutting edge of some remarkable advancements in water and wastewater technology. We live in a world where equipment can automatically start, stop, adjust, optimize, ramp up and down, open, close, throttle, reverse, and much more based on signals like flow rate, oxygen concentration, water level, and electrical resistance. Entire water and wastewater treatment processes can run themselves with very little operator input.

These advancements are important because of our growing awareness of how much we depend on clean water both before and after we use it. Because of this awareness, increasingly strict limits are placed on how “clean” our treated water must be before it is returned to a river or creek. It’s our responsibility as process engineers to help communities steward our environment in a way that doesn’t financially burden the owners of that system—us.

At Prein&Newhof, we realize that providing clean water is not just about helping communities get the latest and greatest technology. While technology has its place, we strive to think like operators as we design systems that are simple, maintainable, and replaceable. It’s operators who are the true experts in our field. They are the ones monitoring water and wastewater treatment plants 24/7 to prevent any dangerous upsets in the treatment process. They are the ones running out to a pump station that lost power during heavy rain to make sure wastewater doesn’t back up in our basements. The easier we can make their jobs, the better.

In addition to thinking like operators, process engineers at Prein&Newhof get to wear many other hats. Some days we are selecting materials and colors for a new building to house process equipment. Other days we are checking on steel reinforcement before a concrete pour. We get to design underground pipelines, coordinate with mechanical and electrical engineers, and provide complex sequences of operation for equipment programmers. And the best part of our job? We get to watch as the systems we have designed are constructed and put into operation. There is always a special sense of satisfaction when we can see and admire the results of our work.

While I wouldn’t have predicted it ten years ago, I’m thankful I ended up in a position where I can serve our community as a process engineer. It has provided a way to steward this beautiful creation while tapping into my nerdy side every now and then. Of course, it has one downside: it’s hard to drive by a pump station without pointing it out to my family! But I point it out because I’m proud of the work I do. It’s easy to forget about the infrastructure we don’t see, but for me, pump stations and treatment plants are powerful symbols of service to others and a reminder of the daily blessings we often take for granted. We are providing a service that previous generations have given to us, and it is a privilege to pass it on to the next generation.

by Amanda Bricker, Lab Technician

Over twenty years ago, I had just completed an internship with Sleeping Bear Dunes National Lakeshore where I helped examine the chemistry of the water and conduct a fish survey of the park’s inland lakes. I tested the E. coli levels at the park’s beaches weekly, monitoring for any potential beach closures. That summer experience gave me my first real glimpse of environmental work in action.

It influenced me to shift my final year at Alma College to focus more heavily on environmental classes, but when I graduated with a Bachelor of Science in Chemistry, I wasn’t entirely sure where it would lead. I did not have a clear plan, just a growing interest in the kind of work that helped protect people and the natural world. It only took a few months after graduation, and I joined the lab team at Prein&Newhof. The reason I have stayed for over two decades is simple: I believe in what we do.

At Prein&Newhof’s Laboratory, we test drinking water, wastewater, stormwater, groundwater, surface water, soils, sludges—you name it. We look at everything from bacteria like coliform and E. coli to chemical contaminants like per- and polyfluoroalkyl (PFAS) substances, lead, nitrates, and volatile organic compounds (VOCs). We work with municipalities, private well owners, local businesses, and environmental consultants on a daily basis. No matter who we are serving, I always feel like I’m contributing to something that matters.

There’s a real sense of purpose in knowing that the work we do helps people make informed decisions about their water. Whether a family is testing their well for peace of mind, or a city is monitoring its water system to better understand trends over time, the data we provide plays an important role. We’re here to provide reliable testing that helps guide the next steps and inform big decisions.

My son once said to me, “Your job is only fun when people have bad water.” It made me laugh because, in a way, he’s right—there is something rewarding about being part of the response when someone has a concern or a problem with their water. When people are worried about what’s coming out of their tap, they’re often scared or overwhelmed. Being able to offer clarity through testing, and to help them know what they’re dealing with, feels like a quiet but meaningful kind of service.

I also love the variety in the work. No two days are ever exactly the same, and there’s always something new to learn. Our team genuinely enjoys the problem-solving aspect of the job and the steady rhythm of lab work. We’re a group of people who care deeply about clean water and about doing things the right way.

What’s kept me here, more than anything, are the passionate coworkers and community members I get to work with on a daily basis. I’ve lived in Michigan my whole life, and I know how much people care about their lakes, rivers, and clean drinking water. I know how personal it is when someone calls about a concern with their home’s water. Being part of the team that helps answer those questions feels like contributing to the health and well-being of our community.

If you’ve ever wondered about what’s in your water or just want to better understand the quality of the water you use every day, Prein&Newhof’s Laboratory is here to help. Whether you’re testing a private well, checking your home for lead or PFAS, or managing compliance for a larger system, we’re here to walk alongside you with science, transparency, and care.

You can learn more about our lab and the services we offer at https://www.preinnewhof.com/laboratory/.

by Matt Levandoski, PLA

Was it divine, born out of need, or pre-meditated? I don’t recall, but in April of 2020, I found myself lacing up my running shoes more than ever before. Not to race or train, but to breathe. I ran every single mile of trail in the Ottawa County Parks System. What started as a fun way to stay in shape became my therapy, my escape, my lifeline.

When I began, I didn’t know that I could enjoy running. After all, I wasn’t a “runner.” That was something crazy disciplined people did because… I guessed they must love pain? But as I plodded along, there was something grounding about the rhythm of my feet on the dirt, the hush of trees in the wind, the occasional deer bounding away into the brush. For many of us in the global pandemic of 2020, the world felt upside-down. Being in nature and on a trail reminded me which way was up, so, as Forrest Gump would say, “I just kept on running.”

What I found on those trails wasn’t just way to burn off the Sluggo’s I had at lunch; I found a sense of personal peace—I found hope. I passed families walking together for the first time in what felt like ages, neighbors smiling and waving at each other from a safe distance, kids laughing as they explored creeks, woods, and playgrounds. In the middle of the world’s chaos, parks became sanctuaries. Not just for me, but for all of us.

And yet, in many communities, parks and open spaces are still treated like optional extras—amenities we get to enjoy when everything else is taken care of in life. We can’t play until our homework is done and our laundry is folded; only then can the guilty pleasure of recreation be considered. Trees, rain gardens, plantings, and benches are often the last things considered in development proposals but are often the first line items cut from budgets. It’s a narrative that needs to change, and I believe it starts with each of us. We need to slow down, to take time to think, to question our own priorities, and to give ourselves permission to listen to what we already know we need: time in nature with our creator, ourselves, and the people and pets we love.

For over 20 years, I’ve seen this mindset firsthand in my work as a Landscape Architect. The time we spend in parks and open spaces is frequently seen as the icing on top, the dessert we earn after we’ve eaten the main course. The miles I logged, the blisters I earned, the smiles I shared, and the way I felt taught me one truth: that parks are essential human infrastructure. Not just because recreation is fun, or a trendy way to get “followers” on social media, but because we need it.

Think about it—from a public health standpoint, parks are preventative medicine. Studies have shown that time in nature reduces stress, lowers blood pressure, improves mood, and boosts immune response. For kids, recess is more than a chance to get the wiggles out, but a way to learn social skills, problem solving, and to improve focus when they go back to the classroom. But it’s not just about mental health. Parks provide places to move our bodies, breathe cleaner air, and reconnect with the rhythms of the natural world—all of which have real, measurable impact on our overall well-being. Parks, open spaces, and time outdoors can help us thrive in our daily lives.

From an environmental perspective, parks and open spaces are working landscapes. They absorb stormwater, provide critical habitats, reduce the heat island effect in urban areas, and improve air and water quality. The founder of Landscape Architecture, Frederick Law Olmstead, understood the value of nature and worked to plan and design a space where people living in highly urbanized New York City could get away from the grind of pavement and buildings: the famous Central Park. Parks are among the most democratic spaces we have. There is no entrance fee. You don’t need a membership. They belong to everyone. A well-designed park serves toddlers and teenagers, elders and athletes, birdwatchers, and bikers alike. That is not an accident—that’s intentional, inclusive design. That is good planning.

One often overlooked, but important, thing that being in nature reminds me is that I am not the center of the world and it’s actually not that scary out here. Visiting a park and sharing a smile with a stranger as we pass on the trail reminds me that people are mostly good, despite what we may be led to believe. When I step outside of my house, office, or car, my perspective changes. It grows, it expands, and it helps me to “see farther,” a core value we share here at Prein&Newhof. When I get out on the trail in the middle of a forest with majestic trees towering over me, I feel small, but I feel safe.

When we save open spaces and create parks, we teach each other how to care for creation, how to care for ourselves, and how to care for each other. That’s the kind of mindset we need more of these days. When the world gets overwhelming, we don’t need more screens, more traffic, or more noise. We need trees. We need space. We need each other.

Over the last 5 years since I ran all the trails in the Ottawa County Parks system, I’ve put the weight back on, gathered a few more grey hairs, and watched my kids grow from middle schoolers to high schoolers. My oldest will even be going off to college at GVSU next fall. Time waits for no one and soon our nest will be empty. Knowing that I can return to a nature to re-connect, re-fuel, and remember, gives me the peace to carry on down the trail of life.  See you out there!